Regulation Code - IHB-R

Section I: Instructional Program

Regulation Title: Exceptional Education Instuctional Programs
Regulation Code: IHB-R

Print Version (In PDF)

This detailed administrative regulation is issued to:
●  Accomplish the requirements of the Governing Board set out in policy IHB-R Special Instructional Programs.
●  Assure District compliance with the requirements of applicable federal and state laws and the lawful regulations of the State Board of Education.
●  Aid District personnel in fulfilling their duties relating to the topic by presenting the procedural information in a format that aligns with the Arizona Department of Education/Exceptional Student Services (ADE/ESS) compliance checklists.
Citations from the following sources are annotated to the material to assist in conducting research and for clarification:
●  Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.)
●  Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) Title 7, Chapter 2, State Board of Education Rules
●  Regulations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act as published in Part 99 of Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.)
●  Regulations to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) as published in Title 34 of the C.F.R., Part 300.
Whenever the term "District" is used in this regulation, it is to be interpreted contextually to mean the School District, the respective local school site, a representative of the District or a representative of the local school site, as is applicable to the circumstance.

Applicability
To accommodate the necessity to present procedural information in a format that aligns with the Arizona Department of Education/Exceptional Student Services (ADE/ESS) compliance checklists, this generic regulation contains procedural requirements for covered individuals of all ages.  However, any statement in this regulation that addresses a provision that is not applicable to the grade levels and age ranges included in the student membership of the District is to be considered for the purposes of compliance to be not applicable.

Child Find
The District will identify, locate, and evaluate all children with disabilities within its geographic boundaries who are in need of special education and related services including, but not limited to, children who are:
●  Homeless;
●  Highly mobile, including migrant children;
●  Wards of the state; and,
●  Attending private schools or who are homeschooled.

In its identification process the District will include children who are suspected of being a child with a disability and in need of special education, even though a student is:
●  Advancing from grade to grade
●  Highly mobile, including a migrant student.  [34 C.F.R. 300.111]

The District will inform the general public and parents within its boundaries of the responsibility for special education services for students aged three (3) through twenty-one (21) years, and how those services may be accessed including information regarding early intervention services for children aged birth through two (2) years.  Services for an eligible student with a disability shall extend through conclusion of the instructional year during which the student attains the age of twenty-two (22). [A.A.C. R7-2-401.C]

The District will require all school-based staff members to review the written procedures related to child identification and referral on an annual basis, and maintain documentation of the staff review.  [A.A.C. R7-2-401.D]

Identification screening for possible disabilities shall be completed within forty-five (45) calendar days after:
●  Entry of each preschool or kindergarten student and any student enrolling without appropriate records or screening, evaluation, and progress in school; or
●  Parent notification of developmental or educational concerns.
Screening procedures shall include vision and hearing status and consideration of the following areas:
●  Cognitive or academic;
●  Communication;
●  Motor;
●  Social or behavioral; and
●  Adaptive development.

For a student transferring into a school, the District shall review enrollment data and educational performance in the prior school.  If there is a history of special education for a student not currently eligible for special education or poor progress, the name of the student shall be submitted to the administrator for consideration of the need for a referral for a full and individual evaluation or other services.  [A.A.C. R7-2-401.D]

If a concern about a student is identified through screening procedures or review of records, the parents of the student shall be notified of the concern within ten (10) school days and informed of the District's procedures to follow-up on the student's needs.  [A.A.C. R7-2-401.D]
The District shall maintain documentation of the identification procedures utilized, the dates of entry into school, notification by parents of a concern and the dates of screening.  The dates shall be maintained in the student's permanent records.  [A.A.C. R7-2-401.D]

If the screening indicates a possible disability, the name of the student shall be submitted to the administrator for consideration of the need for a referral for a full and individual evaluation or other services.  A parent or a student may request an evaluation of the student.  [A.A.C. R7-2-401.D]

If, after consultation with the parent, the District determines that a full and individual evaluation is not warranted, the District shall provide prior written notice and procedural safeguards notice to the parent in a timely manner.  [A.A.C. R7-2-401.D]

Confidentiality
The District will permit parents to inspect and review any education records relating to their children that are collected, maintained or used by the District under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The District will comply with a request without unnecessary delay and in no case more than forty-five (45) days after the request has been made, and before:
●  Any individualized education program (IEP) meeting;
●  Any hearing involving a due process complaint or disciplinary hearing;
●  Any resolution session.  [34 C.F.R. 300.613]

The right to inspect and review education records includes:
●  The right to a response from the District to reasonable requests for explanations and interpretations of the records;
●  The right to request that the District provide copies of the records if failure to provide those copies would effectively prevent the parent from exercising the right to inspect and review the records; and
●  The right to have a representative of the parent inspect and review the records.  [34 C.F.R. 300.613]

The District may presume that the parent has authority to inspect and review records relating to his or her child unless the District has been advised to the contrary by legal proceeding involving guardianship, separation and divorce.  [34 C.F.R. 300.613]

The District will keep a record of parties obtaining access to education records collected, maintained or used under IDEA (except access by parents and authorized employees of the District), including:
●  The name of the party;
●  The date access was given; and
●  The purpose for which the party is authorized to use the records.  [34 C.F.R 300.614]

If any education record includes information on more than one (1) child, the parents of those children have the right to inspect and review only the information relating to their child.  [34 C.F.R 300.615]
The District will provide parents on request a list of the types and locations of education records collected, maintained or used by the District.  [34 C.F.R 300.616]

The District may charge a fee for copies of records that are made for parents if the fee does not effectively prevent the parents from exercising their right to inspect and review records.  [34 C.F.R 300.617]

The District will not charge a fee to search for or to retrieve information.  [34 C.F.R 300.615]

A parent who believes that information in the education records collected, maintained or used by the District is inaccurate or misleading or violates the privacy or other rights of the child, may request the District to amend the information.  [34 C.F.R 300.618]

The District will decide whether to amend the information in accordance with the request in a reasonable period of time of receipt of the request.  [34 C.F.R 300.618]

If the District refuses to amend the information in accordance with the request, it will inform the parent of the refusal and advise the parent of the right to a hearing under 34 C.F.R 300.619.   [34 C.F.R 300.618]

The District will, on request, provide an opportunity for a hearing to challenge information in education records to ensure that it is not inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy or other rights of the child.  [34 C.F.R 300.618]

If, as a result of a hearing, the District decides to amend information determined inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy or other rights of the child, it will do so accordingly and so inform the parent in writing.  [34 C.F.R 300.618]

If, as a result of a hearing, the District decides that the information is not inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy or other rights of the child, the District will inform the parent of the parent's right to place in the maintained records a statement commenting on the information or setting forth any reasons for disagreeing with the District's decision.  [34 C.F.R 300.618]

Parental consent will be obtained before personally identifiable information is disclosed to parties other than participating agencies, unless the information is contained in education records and the disclosure is authorized without parent consent under Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).  [34 C.F.R 300.622]

Parental consent will be obtained before personally identifiable information is released to officials of participating agencies providing or paying for transition services in accordance with §300.321.  [34 C.F.R 300.622]

If a child is enrolled or is going to enroll in a private school that is not located in the boundaries of the district of the parent's residence, parental consent will be obtained before any personally identifiable information about the child is released between officials in the district where the private school is located and officials in the district of the parent's residence.  [34 C.F.R 300.622]

The District will protect the confidentiality of personally identifiable information at collection, storage, disclosure, and destruction stages.  [34 C.F.R 300.623]

One (1) official at the District will assume responsibility for ensuring the confidentiality of any personally identifiable information.
All persons collecting or using personally identifiable information will receive training or instruction regarding the State's policies and procedures under 300.123 and FERPA (34 C.F.R. part 99).  [34 C.F.R 300.623]

The District will maintain, for public inspection, a current listing of the names and positions of its employees who may have access to personally identifiable information.  [34 C.F.R 300.623]

The District will inform parents when personally identifiable information collected, maintained, or used for IDEA purposes is no longer needed to provide educational services to the child.  [34 C.F.R 300.624]

The information will be destroyed at the request of the parents.  However, a permanent record of a student's name, address, and phone number, his or her grades, attendance record, classes attended, grade level completed, and year completed may be maintained without time limitation.  [34 C.F.R 300.624]

The rights of the parents regarding educational records are transferred to the student at age eighteen (18) under FERPA unless the student has been declared legally incompetent, or the student has executed a delegation of rights to make educational decisions pursuant to A.R.S. 15-773.  [34 C.F.R 300.625]

If the rights of the parents regarding educational records are transferred to the student at age eighteen (18) under the IDEA, the District will provide any notice required under the procedural safeguards provisions.  [34 C.F.R 300.625]

Discipline
On a case-by-case basis and in consideration of any unique circumstances, school personnel may remove a child with a disability who violates a student code of conduct from his or her current placement to an appropriate interim alternative educational setting, another setting, or suspension, for not more than ten (10) consecutive school days (to the extent those alternatives are applied to children without disabilities), and for additional removals of not more than ten (10) consecutive school days in that same school year for separate incidents of misconduct, as long as those removals do not constitute a change of placement under §300.536.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

After a child with a disability has been removed from his or her current placement for ten (10) school days in the same school year, during any subsequent days of removal the District will provide services to the extent required to:
●  Enable the child to continue to participate in the general education curriculum, although in another setting, and to progress toward meeting their IEP goals; and
● Receive, as appropriate, a functional behavioral assessment, behavioral intervention services and modifications that are designed to address the behavior violation so that it does not recur.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

The District is only required to provide services during periods of removal to a child with a disability who has been removed from his or her current placement for the (10) days or less in that school year, if it provides services to non-disabled children similarly removed.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

After a child with a disability has been removed from his or her current placement for ten (10) school days, and the current removal is for not more than ten (10) consecutive school days and not a change of placement, school personnel, in consultation with at least one of the child's teachers, determine the extent to which services are needed, so as to enable the child to continue to participate in the general education curriculum and to progress toward meeting the individualized education program (IEP) goals.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

If the removal is a change in placement, the child's IEP team determines the appropriate services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

Within ten (10) school days of any decision to change the placement of a child with a disability because of a violation of a code of student conduct, the District, parent, and relevant members of the IEP team will review all relevant information in the student's file, the IEP, teacher observations, and any relevant information to determine:
●  If the conduct was caused by, or had a direct and substantial relationship to, the child's disability; or
●  If the conduct in question was the direct result of the District's failure to implement the IEP.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

The conduct will be determined to be a manifestation of the disability if either of the above-named conditions occurred, and, if the IEP was not implemented, the District will take immediate steps to remedy that deficiency.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

If the District, parent, and relevant members of the IEP team determine that the conduct was a manifestation of the child's disability, the child will be returned to the placement from which the child was removed, unless the parent and District agree to a change of placement.  The IEP team will either:
●  Conduct a functional behavioral assessment, unless already done, and implement a behavioral intervention plan; or
●  If a behavioral intervention plan has already been developed, review the plan and modify it, as necessary, to address the behavior.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

School personnel may remove a student to an interim alternative educational setting for not more than forty-five (45) school days without regard to manifestation of disability if the child:
●  Carries a weapon to or possesses a weapon at school, on school premises, to or at a school function under the jurisdiction of the state or the District;
●  Knowingly possesses or uses illegal drugs, or sells or solicits the sale of a controlled substance, while at school, on school premises, or at a school function under the jurisdiction of the state or the District; or
●  Has inflicted serious bodily injury upon another person while at school, on school premises, or at a school function under the jurisdiction of the state or the District.  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

The District will notify parents and provide notice of procedural safeguards on the day the District determines the student has violated the code of conduct, and the violation constitutes a change in placement (i.e., interim alternative education setting).  [34 C.F.R. 300.530]

The child's IEP team determines the interim alternative educational setting for services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.531]

The parent of a child with a disability who disagrees with any decision regarding placement under §§300.530 and 300.531 or the manifestation determination may appeal the decision by requesting an expedited due process hearing in conformance with §§300.310 through 300.314 and A.A.C. R7-2-405.I.  [34 C.F.R. 300.532]

When the District believes that maintaining the current placement of the child is substantially likely to cause injury to the child or others the District may appeal the decision by requesting an expedited due process hearing in conformance with §§300.310 through 300.314 and A.A.C. R7-2-405.I.  [34 C.F.R. 300.532]

The student will remain in the interim alternative educational setting pending the decision of the hearing officer or expiration of the interim setting, whichever comes first, unless the parent and District agree otherwise.  [34 C.F.R. 300.532]

A non-eligible student who engaged in a behavior that violated a code of student conduct may assert protections if the District had knowledge that the child was a child with a disability before the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary action occurred. The District will be deemed to have such knowledge if:
●  The parent of the child expressed concern in writing to supervisory or administrative personnel of the District, or a teacher of the child, that the child is in need of special education and related services;
●  The parent of the child requested an evaluation of the child pursuant to §§300.300 through 300.311; or
●  The teacher of the child, or other personnel of the District, expressed specific concerns about a pattern of behavior demonstrated by the child directly to the director of special education or to other supervisory personnel of the District.  [34 C.F.R. 300.534]

The District will not be deemed to have knowledge if the parent of the child:
●  Has not allowed an IDEA evaluation of the child;
●  Has refused special education services for the child; or
●  The child has been evaluated and determined to not be a child with a disability under IDEA. [34 C.F.R. 300.534]

When the District does not have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability prior to taking disciplinary measures against the child, the child may be disciplined as other children without disabilities who engage in comparable behaviors.

If an evaluation is requested during the time in which a child is subjected to disciplinary measures, the evaluation will be conducted in an expedited manner.
●  Until the evaluation is completed, the child remains in the educational placement determined by the District, which can include suspension or expulsion without educational services.
●  If the child is determined to be a child with a disability, the District will provide special education and related services in accordance with this part, including the requirements of §§300.530 through 300.536. [34 C.F.R. 300.534]

The District may report a crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities to enable them to exercise their responsibilities.  34 C.F.R. 300.535]

When reporting a crime committed by a child with a disability the District ensures that copies of the special education and disciplinary records of the child are transmitted for consideration by the appropriate authorities to whom the District reports the crime, but only to the extent permitted by FERPA.  [34 C.F.R. 300.535]
A change of placement occurs if:
●  The removal is for more than ten (10) consecutive school days; or
●  The child has been subjected to a series of removals that constitute a pattern:
■  because the series of removals total more than ten (10) school days in a school year;
■  because the child's behavior is substantially similar to the behavior in previous incidents that resulted in a series of removals; and
■  because of such additional factors as the length of each removal, the total amount of time the child has been removed, and the proximity of the removals to one another.  [34 C.F.R. 300.536]

The District will determine on a case-by-case basis whether a pattern of removals constitutes a change of placement, and such determinations are subject to review through due process and judicial proceedings.  [34 C.F.R. 300.536]

Evaluation and Eligibility
The District, when proposing to conduct an initial evaluation to determine if a child qualifies as a child with a disability, and after reviewing existing data with the parents and providing prior written notice, will obtain informed consent from the parent of the child before collecting any additional data.
●  Parental consent for initial evaluation will not be construed as consent for initial provision of special education and related services.
●  The District will make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent for an initial evaluation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

For initial evaluations only, if the child is a ward of the state, is not residing with the child's parent, the District is not required to obtain consent from the parent if:
●  Despite reasonable efforts to do so, the District cannot discover the whereabouts of the parents of the child;
●  The rights of the parents of the child have been terminated by the court;
●  The rights of the parent to make educational decisions have been subrogated by a judge and consent for an initial evaluation has been given by an individual appointed by the judge to represent the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.536]

The District may, but is not required to seek informed consent through due process procedures if the parent of a child who is enrolled or seeking to enroll in the District refuses consent for an initial evaluation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

The District will obtain informed consent from the parent of the child before the initial provision of special education and related services to the child, and will make reasonable efforts to obtain that consent.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

If a parent refuses consent for the initial provision of special education and related services, the District will not seek consent through due process hearing procedures.  The District:
●  Will not be considered to be in violation to provide a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE);
●  Is not required to convene a IEP team meeting or develop an IEP for the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

If, at any time subsequent to the initial provision of special education and related services, the parent of a child revokes consent in writing for the continued provision of special education and related services, the District:
●  May not continue to provide special education and related services to the child, but shall provide prior written notice before ceasing the provision of special education and related services;
●  May not use the mediation procedures or the due process procedures in order to obtain agreement or a ruling that the services may be provided to the child;
●  Will not be considered in violation of the requirement to make FAPE available to the child because of the failure to provide the child with further special education and related services; and
●  Is not required to convene an IEP Team meeting or develop an IEP for the child for further provision of special education and related services.

The District will obtain informed consent prior to conducting any reevaluation of a child with a disability.
●  If the parent refuses consent, the District may utilize due process hearing procedures to seek consent, but does not violate its obligation if it declines to pursue the evaluation or reevaluation.
●    The informed parental consent for reevaluation need not be obtained if the District can demonstrate that:
■  it made reasonable efforts to obtain such consent and has documented those attempts;
■  the child's parent has failed to respond.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]
Parental consent is not required before:
●  Reviewing existing data as part of an evaluation or reevaluation; or
●  Administering a test or other evaluation that is administered to all children unless consent is required of parents of all children prior to administration.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

The District will not use a parent's refusal to consent to one service or activity under this section to deny the parent or child any other service, benefit, or activity of the District, except as required by this part.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

If a parent of a child who is home-schooled or placed in a private school by the parents at their own expense does not provide consent for the initial evaluation or the reevaluation, or the parent fails to respond to a request to provide consent, the District will not utilize due process hearing procedures to seek consent.  [34 C.F.R. 300.300]

Consistent with consent requirements of §300.300, either a parent of a child or the District may initiate a request for an initial evaluation to determine if a child is a child with a disability.  [34 C.F.R. 300.301]
The initial evaluation will:
●  Be completed within sixty (60) days of receiving parental consent for the evaluation, unless:
■  the parents and the District agree that it is in the best interest of the child to extend the timeline to complete the evaluation for an additional thirty (30) days; or;
■  the child enrolls in the District following the child's departure from a previous district after the parent has provided consent and before the determination of eligibility by the child's previous district. In that event, the District ensures prompt completion of the evaluation.
■  the parent of a child with a disability repeatedly fails or refuses to produce the child for the evaluation.
●  Consist of procedures to determine if the child is a child with a disability and to determine the educational needs of the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.301]
The District will conduct a reevaluation of a child with a disability if:
●  The District determines that the educational or related service needs, including improved academic achievement and functional performance, of the child warrant a reevaluation; or
●  If the child's parents or teacher requests a reevaluation; except
●  The District will not conduct a reevaluation more than once a year unless the parent and District agree otherwise.  [34 C.F.R. 300.303]

The District will conduct a reevaluation at least once every three (3) years, unless the parent and the District agree that a reevaluation is unnecessary.  [34 C.F.R. 300.303]

The District will provide prior written notice to the parents of a child who has, or who is suspected of having, a disability, that describes the evaluation procedures that the District proposes to conduct.  [34 C.F.R. 300.304]

In conducting an evaluation or reevaluation, the District will:
●  Use a variety of assessment tools and strategies to gather relevant functional, developmental, and academic information about the child, including information provided by the parent in order to determine;
■  whether the child is a child with a disability; and
■  if the child is a child with a disability, information related to enabling the child to be involved in and progress in the general education curriculum (or for a preschool child, to participate in appropriate activities).
●  Not use any single measure or assessment as the sole criterion for determining whether a child is a child with a disability and for determining an appropriate educational program for the child; and
●  Use technically sound instruments that may assess the relative contribution of cognitive and behavioral factors, in addition to physical or developmental factors.  [34 C.F.R. 300.304]

The District ensures that evaluation materials and strategies:
●  Are selected and administered so as not to be discriminatory on a racial or cultural basis;
●  Are administered in the child's native language or other mode of communication and in the form most likely to yield accurate information on what the child knows and can do academically, developmentally, and functionally, unless it is clearly not feasible to do so;

1. A student whose primary language is ASL has the right to have any Section 504 or IDEA evaluation conducted:
   1. By a school psychologist who is fluent in ASL; and/or
   2. With an ASL interpreter and a Certified Deaf Interpreter to provide interpretation/translation.
2. The District may select between options 1 and 2 above, subject to the requirement to provide effective communication under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504.
3. A student’s primary language is determined by the student and/or their parents. Primary language is not an IEP team determination or something the District can assign.

●  Are used for the purposes for which the assessment(s) or measure(s) are valid and reliable;
●  Are administered by trained and knowledgeable personnel;
●  Are administered in accordance with the instructions provided by the assessment publisher;
●  Are selected and administered so as to ensure that if administered to a child with impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills, the assessment results accurately reflect the child's aptitude or achievement level or whatever other factors the test purports to measure rather than reflecting the child's impairments (unless those skills are the factors being measured).
●  Assess the child in all areas related to the suspected disability, including, if appropriate, health, vision, hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, adaptive behavior, communicative status, and motor abilities; and
●  Are sufficiently comprehensive to identify all of the child's special education and related services needs, whether or not those needs are commonly associated with the child's disability.
●  Provide relevant information that directly assists in determining the educational needs of the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.304]

Evaluations of children who transfer to or from another District in the same school year are coordinated with the prior and subsequent schools, in order to expedite the completion of a full evaluation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.304]
As part of an initial evaluation (if appropriate), and as part of any reevaluation, the IEP team and other qualified professionals, as appropriate, will:
●  Review existing evaluation data on the child including:
■  evaluations and information provided by the parents;
■  current classroom-based, local and state-wide assessments, and classroom-based observations;
■  observations by teachers, and related services providers.
●  On the basis of that review, and input from the child's parents, identify what additional data, if any, are needed to determine whether:
■  the child is or continues to be a child with a disability, and, if so, the educational needs of the child;
■  the present levels of academic achievement and related developmental needs of the child;
■  whether the child needs special education and related services to enable the child to meet measurable annual IEP goals and to participate, as appropriate, in the general education curriculum.
●  The IEP team may conduct the review without a meeting.  [34 C.F.R. 300.305]

If additional data are needed, the District will administer the assessments required to obtain the additional data.  [34 C.F.R. 300.305]

If additional data are not needed to determine whether the child continues to be a child with a disability, and to determine the child's educational needs, the District will notify the parents of:
●  The determination and the reasons for the determination; and
●  The right of the parents to request an assessment to determine whether the child continues to be a child with a disability and to determine the child's educational needs.  [34 C.F.R. 300.305]

The District will evaluate a child before determining that the child is no longer a child with a disability except when the termination is due to graduation with a regular high school diploma or at the conclusion of the instructional year during which the child attained the age of twenty-two (22).
●  When the child's eligibility terminates because of graduation or at the conclusion of the instructional year during which the child attained the age of twenty-two (22), the District will provide a summary of the child's academic achievement and functional performance that includes recommendations on how to assist the child in meeting the child's postsecondary goals.  [34 C.F.R. 300.305]

Upon completion of the evaluation process, the District ensures that:
●  A group of qualified professionals and the parent of the child determine:
■  if the child is a child with a disability under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Arizona State Statutes; and
■  if so, the educational needs of the child.
●  The parents are provided, at no cost, a copy of the evaluation report and eligibility determination.  [34 C.F.R. 300.306]

A child will not be determined to be a child with a disability if the primary factor for the determination is:
●  Lack of appropriate instruction in reading, including the essential components of reading instruction (as defined in 1208(3) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act [ESEA]);
●  Lack of appropriate instruction in math; or
●  Limited English proficiency.  [34 C.F.R. 300.306]

The eligibility determination, including education needs, will be based on all of the information sources used in the evaluation process, and if deemed eligible and in need of special education and related services, an IEP will be developed in accordance with §300.320 through 300.324.  [34 C.F.R. 300.306]

Additional procedures for identifying children with specific learning disabilities:
●  Option 1:
■  The District will use the state-adopted criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability through a process based on the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention in conformity with IDEA Regulations §300.307-311.  [34 C.F.R. 300.307]
●  Option 2:
■  The District will use a criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability through the identification of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement in conformity with IDEA Regulations §300.307-311.  [34 C.F.R. 300.307]
●  Option 3:
■  The District will determine, on an individual child basis, the criteria for determining whether a child has a specific learning disability using one of the following criteria in conformity with IDEA Regulations §300.307-311:
⇒  The state-adopted criteria based on a child's response to scientific, research-based intervention;
⇒  The identification of a severe discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement.  [34 C.F.R. 300.307]

The determination of whether a child suspected of having a specific learning disability is a child with a disability will be made by the child's parents and a team of qualified professionals which will include:
●  The child's regular education teacher; or
●  If the child does not have a regular education teacher, then a regular education teacher qualified to teach children of that age;
●  For a child of less than school age, an individual qualified by the state to teach children of their age;
●  At least one (1) person qualified to conduct individual diagnostic evaluations of children, such as a school psychologist, speech-language pathologist, or remedial reading teacher.  [34 C.F.R. 300.308]

A child may be determined to have a specific learning disability if:
●  The child does not achieve adequately for the child's age or to meet state–approved grade level standards in one (1) or more of the following areas, when provided with learning experiences and instruction appropriate for the child's age or meet state–approved grade level standards:
■  oral expression
■  listening comprehension
■  written expression
■  basic reading skill
■  reading fluency skills
■  reading comprehension
■  mathematics calculation
■  mathematics problem solving
●  The child does not make sufficient progress to meet age or state–approved grade level standards in one (1) or more of the areas in listed immediately above when using a process based on the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention; or
●  The child exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in performance, achievement, or both, relative to age, state–approved grade level standards, or intellectual development, that is determined by the group to be relevant to the identification of a specific learning disability, through one (1) of the following methods:
■  a discrepancy between achievement and ability;
■  the child's response to scientific, research-based interventions, or
■  other alternative research-based procedures,
using appropriate assessments.  [34 C.F.R. 300.309]

The findings of this section are not primarily the result of:
●  A visual, hearing or motor disability;
●  Mental retardation;
●  Emotional disturbance;
●  Cultural factors;
●  Environmental or economic disadvantage; or
●  Limited English proficiency.  [34 C.F.R. 300.309]

The group ensures that the underachievement is not due to a lack of appropriate instruction in reading or math and consider:
●  Data that demonstrate that prior to, or as part of, the referral process, the child was provided appropriate instruction in regular education settings, delivered by qualified personnel; and
●  Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals, reflecting formal assessment of student progress during instruction, which was provided to the child's parents.  [34 C.F.R. 300.309]

The District will promptly request parent consent to evaluate if, prior to referral, the child has not made adequate progress after an appropriate period of time when provided instruction described in the two (2) immediately preceding bullets.   [34 C.F.R. 300.309]

The District ensures that the child is observed in their learning environment, including the regular classroom setting, to document the child's academic performance and behavior in the areas of difficulty.  [34 C.F.R. 300.310]

In the case of a child less than school age or out of school, a group member will observe the child in an environment appropriate for a child that age.  [34 C.F.R. 300.310]

For a child suspected of having a specific learning disability, the eligibility determination will contain a statement of:
●  Whether the child has a specific learning disability;
●  The basis for making the determination, including an assurance the determination was made in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities

Education Act;
●  The relevant behavior, if any, noted during the observation and the relationship of that behavior to the child's academic functioning;
●   The educationally relevant medical findings, if any;
●  Whether the child does not achieve adequately for their age or to meet state-approved grade level standards consistent with whether the child has a specific learning disability; and does not make sufficient progress to meet age or state-approved grade level standards consistent with the basis of a determination in accordance with IDEA; or
●  The child exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in performance, achievement, or both, relative to age, state-approved grade level standards or intellectual development consistent with the observation of relevant behavior.
●  The determination of the group concerning the effects of a visual, hearing, or motor disability; mental retardation; emotional disturbance; cultural factors; environmental or economic disadvantage; or limited English proficiency of the child's achievement level.  [34 C.F.R. 300.311]

If the child participated in a process that assessed the child's response to scientific, research-based intervention:
●  The instructional strategies used and the student-centered data collected; and
●  The documentation that the child's parents were notified about the state's policies regarding the amount and nature of student performance that would be collected and the general education services that would be provided;
●  Strategies for increasing the rate of learning; and
●  The parent's right to request an evaluation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.311]

Each group member will certify in writing whether the report reflects the member's conclusion.  If it does not, the group member will submit a separate statement presenting the member's conclusions.  [34 C.F.R. 300.311]

Free Appropriate Public Education
The determination that a child is eligible for special education and related services will be made on an individual basis by a properly constituted District team.  [34 C.F.R. 300.306 and, if applicable, 300.308]

For preschool children (age three [3] to five [5]):
●  The District will:
■  Make FAPE available no later than the child's third birthday;
■  Ensure that an IEP or an Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is in effect for each child by that date;
■  Ensure that a child's IEP team determines the date when services under the IEP or IFSP will begin if a child's third birthday occurs during the summer.

For school-aged children (age five [5] through twenty-one [21]):
●  The District will make FAPE available to any child who needs special education and related services, even though the child has not failed or been retained in a course or grade, and is advancing from grade to grade.  Services for an eligible student with a disability shall extend through conclusion of the instructional year during which the student attains the age of twenty-two (22).

The District will establish policy and procedures with regard to allowable pupil-teacher ratios and pupil-staff ratios within the District or county for provision of special education services.  [A.R.S. 15-764]

The special education programs and services provided shall be conducted only in a school facility which houses regular education classes or in other facilities approved by the division of special education.  [A.R.S. 15-764]

The District ensures that assistive technology devices or services or both will be available to a child with a disability, if required, as a part of:
●  special education;
●  related services;
●  supplementary aids and service.  [34 C.F.R. 300.105]

On a case-by-case basis, the District ensures the use of school-purchased assistive technology devices in a child's home or other setting if the child's IEP team determines that the child needs access to those devices in order to receive FAPE.  [34 C.F.R. 300.105]

The District will make extended school year services available as necessary to provide FAPE to children with disabilities.
●  Extended school year (ESY) services will be provided only if a child's IEP team determines, in accordance with §§300.320-300.324, that the services are necessary for the provision of FAPE.
●  Services will not be:
■  limited to a particular category of disability; or,
■  unilaterally limited to the type, amount, or duration of services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.106]

The ESY services that are provided to a child with a disability will:
●  Be provided beyond the normal school year of the District;
●  Be provided in accordance with the child's IEP;
●  Be provided at no cost to the parents of the child; and
●  Meet the standards of the state.  [34 C.F.R. 300.106]

The District will afford children with disabilities an equal opportunity for participation in nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities including, as determined appropriate and necessary by the child's IEP team, the provision of supplementary aids and services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.107]

Nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities may include counseling services, athletics, transportation, health services, recreational activities, special interest groups or clubs sponsored by the District, referrals to agencies that provide assistance to individuals with disabilities, and employment of students, including both employment by the District and assistance in making outside employment available.  [34 C.F.R. 300.107]

The District will make regular physical education services available to children with disabilities to the same extent that the District provides those services to children without disabilities, unless:
●  The child is enrolled full time in a separate facility; or
●  The child needs specially designed physical education as prescribed in the child's IEP.  [34 C.F.R. 300.108]

If a child is enrolled in a separate facility, the District ensures that the child receives appropriate physical education services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.108]

If special physical education is prescribed in a child's IEP, the District will provide for those services, either directly or through other public or private programs.  [34 C.F.R. 300.108]

The District ensures that children with disabilities have available to them the variety of education programs and services that are available to nondisabled children, including art, music, industrial arts, consumer and homemaking education, and vocational education.  [34 C.F.R. 300.110]

When serving children wearing hearing aids or surgically implanted medical devices, the District ensures that:
●  The hearing aids worn in school by children with hearing impairments are functioning properly; and
●  The external components of surgically implanted medical devices (e.g., cochlear implants) are functioning properly, except that the District will not be responsible for any post-surgical maintenance, programming or replacement of any component, external or internal, of the medical device.  [34 C.F.R. 300.113]

The District may use the Medicaid or other public benefits or insurance programs in which a child participates to provide or pay for services required under IDEA, as permitted under the public benefits or insurance program, except that the District:
●  Will not require parents to sign up for or enroll in public benefits or insurance programs to receive FAPE;
●  Will not require parents to incur out-of-pocket expenses such as payment of a deductible or co-pay for services required by IDEA, but may pay the cost that parents otherwise would be required to pay;
●  Will not use a child's public benefit if that use would:
■  decrease lifetime benefits;
■  result in the family paying for non-school services that would otherwise be paid for by public benefits;
■  increase premiums or lead to discontinuation of benefits; or
■  risk loss of eligibility.  [34 C.F.R. 300.154]

The District will notify parents that their refusal to allow access to their public benefits does not relieve the District of its responsibility to provide all required IDEA services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.154]

The District will obtain parent consent prior to accessing a child's or parent's public benefits or insurance for the first time.

The District will provide a written notification to the child's parents before accessing the child's or parent's public benefits or insurance for the first time and prior to obtaining the one-time parental consent and annually thereafter.

Graduation
The District ensures that the Governing Board shall prescribe graduation criteria for students with disabilities from its high schools, which shall include accomplishment of the academic standards in at least reading, writing, mathematics, science and social studies, as determined by District assessment.  [A.R.S. 15-701(B) and A.A.C. R7-2-301(D)(1)]

The District ensures that the Governing Board shall develop a course of study and graduation and promotion requirements for all students placed in special education programs in accordance with  R7-2-401 et seq.  [A.R.S. 15-701(B) and A.A.C. R7-2-301(D)(1)]

The District will not be obligated to provide FAPE to students with disabilities who have graduated from high school with a regular high school diploma.  [34 C.F.R. 300.102]

The exception does not apply to children who have graduated from high school but have not been awarded a regular high school diploma.  [34 C.F.R. 300.102]

Graduation from high school with a regular high school diploma constitutes a change of placement requiring prior written notice in accordance with §300.503.  [34 C.F.R. 300.102]

An evaluation is not required before the termination of a child's eligibility due to graduation from secondary school with a regular diploma or due to conclusion of the instructional year during which the student attains the age of twenty-two (22).  [34 C.F.R. 300.305]

For a child no longer eligible due to graduation or exceeding the age of eligibility, the District will provide the child with a summary of the child's academic achievement and functional performance, which shall include recommendations on how to assist the child in meeting the child's post secondary goals.  [34 C.F.R. 300.305]

Pupils with disabilities as defined in A.R.S. 15-761 or children who receive special education as defined in 15-763, shall not be required to achieve passing scores on competency tests in order to graduate from high school unless the pupil is learning at a level appropriate for the pupil's grade level in a specific academic area and unless a passing score on a competency test is specifically required in a specific academic area by the pupil's IEP as mutually agreed on by the pupil's parents (or eighteen [18] year old student) and IEP team.  [A.R.S. 15-701.01(3)]

Individualized  Education  Program
The contents of each individualized education program (IEP) will include a statement of:
●  The child's present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, including: ●  Measurable annual goals, including academic and functional goals designed to: ●  How the child's progress toward meeting the IEP goals will be measured and when periodic reports on the child's progress toward the goals will be provided;
●  The special education and related services to be provided to the child, the supplementary aids and services to be provided to the child or on behalf of the child, the program modifications or supports for school personnel that will be provided to enable the child: ●  The extent, if any, to which the child will not participate with nondisabled children in the regular class and in extracurricular and other nonacademic activities;
●  Any individual accommodations that are needed to measure the academic achievement and functional performance of the child on state and District-wide assessments;
●  If the IEP team determines that the child must take an alternate assessment instead of a particular regular state or District-wide assessment of student achievement, a statement of why: ●  The projected date for the beginning of the services and modifications and the anticipated frequency, location, and duration of those services and modifications.  [34 C.F.R. 300.320]

Beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the child turns sixteen (16), or younger if determined appropriate by the IEP team, and updated annually, the IEP will also include a statement of:
●  appropriate measurable postsecondary goals based upon age appropriate transition assessments related to training, education, employment, and, where appropriate independent living skills;
●  transition services (including courses of study) needed to assist the child in reaching those goals.  [34 C.F.R. 300.320]

Beginning not later than one (1) year before a student reaches the age of eighteen (18), the IEP will include a statement that the parents and the student have been informed of the rights under Part B, if any, that will transfer to the student on reaching the age of eighteen (18).  [34 C.F.R. 300.320]

The IEP team for each child with a disability will include:
●  The parents of the child;
●  Not less than one (1) regular education teacher of the child (if the child is, or may be, participating in the regular education environment);
●  Not less than one (1) special education teacher of the child, or where appropriate, not less than one special education provider of the child;
●  A representative of the District who: ●  An individual who can interpret the instructional implications of evaluation results, who may be a member of the team described in the IEP team described above, with the exception of the parents.
●  At the discretion of the parent or the District, other individuals who have knowledge or special expertise regarding the child, including related services personnel as appropriate; and
●  Whenever appropriate, the child with a disability.
●  A child of any age if the purpose of the meeting is to consider postsecondary goals and transition services needed to assist the child in reaching the IEP goals;
●  If the student does not attend the IEP meeting, the District will take other steps to ensure that the student's preferences and interests are considered.
●  To the extent appropriate and with consent of the parents or the adult child;
■  the District will invite a representative of any participating agency that is likely to be responsible for providing or paying for transition services.
■  for a child who is transitioning from the Arizona Early Intervention Program (AzEIP), representatives from AzEIP will be invited to the initial IEP if the parent requests.  [34 C.F.R. 300.321]

A member of the District IEP team described above, and including a person who can interpret the results, is not required to attend the IEP meeting if the parent and the school agree in writing prior to the meeting that attendance is not necessary because the member's area of curriculum or related services is not being modified or discussed in the meeting.  [34 C.F.R. 300.321]

A member of the District IEP team described above, and including a person who can interpret the results, may be excused from attending the IEP meeting in whole or part when the meeting involves a modification to or discussion of the member's area of the curriculum or related services if the parent, in writing and the District consent to the excusal, and the member submits, in writing to the IEP team, input into the development of the IEP prior to the meeting.  [34 C.F.R. 300.321]

In the case of a child previously served by AzEIP, an invitation to the initial IEP team meeting will, at the request of the parent, be sent to the AzEIP service coordinator to assist with the smooth transition of services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.321]

The District will take steps to ensure parent(s) of a child with a disability are present at each IEP meeting or are afforded the opportunity to participate by:
●  Notifying parents of the meeting early enough to ensure that they will have an opportunity to attend; and
●  Scheduling the meeting at a mutually agreed on time and place.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

The meeting notice will:
● Indicate the purpose, time, and location of the meeting and who will be in attendance; and
●  Inform the parents of the provisions relating to the participation of other individuals who have knowledge or special expertise about the child and of representatives of the AzEIP if the meeting is for an initial IEP of a child transitioning from AzEIP.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

Beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the child turns sixteen (16), the notice will also:
●  Indicate that a purpose of the meeting will be the consideration of postsecondary goals and transition services;
●  Indicate that the District will invite the student;
●  Identify any other agency that will be invited to send a representative.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

If neither parent can attend, the District will use other methods to ensure parent participation, including individual or conference telephone calls.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

A meeting may be conducted without a parent in attendance if the District is unable to convince the parents that they should attend.  In this case, the

District will maintain a record of its attempts to arrange a mutually agreed on time and place, such as:
●  Detailed records of telephone calls made or attempted and the results of those  calls;
●  Copies of correspondence sent to the parents and any responses received; and
●  Detailed records of visits made to the parent's home or place of employment and the results of those visits.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

The District will take whatever action is necessary to help the parent understand the proceedings at the IEP meeting, including arranging for an interpreter for parents with deafness or whose native language is other than English.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

The District will give the parent a copy of the child's IEP at no cost to the parent.  [34 C.F.R. 300.322]

At the beginning of each school year, the District will have in effect for each child with a disability in its jurisdiction, an IEP as defined in 300.320.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

The District ensures that:
●  A meeting to develop an IEP for an eligible child is conducted within thirty (30) days of a determination of eligibility for special education and related services.
●  As soon as possible following the development of the IEP, the services indicated in the IEP are made available to the child.  An IEP will be in effect at the beginning of each school year.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

For a child aged two (2) years nine (9) months to five (5) years previously served by AzEIP, the IEP team will consider the contents of the child's Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP).  An IFSP may serve as the IEP of the child if:
●  The District has provided the parents with a detailed explanation of the differences between an IEP and an IFSP;
●  The parent and the District agree in writing to the use of an IFSP;
●  The IFSP contains an educational component that promotes school readiness and includes pre-literacy, language and numeric skills; and
●  The IFSP is developed in accordance with IEP procedures.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

The District ensures that each child's IEP is accessible to each regular education teacher, special education teacher, related service provider and any other service provider who is responsible for implementing the IEP.
●  Each teacher and related service provider will be informed of his or her specific responsibilities in implementing the IEP; and
●  The specific accommodations, modifications, and supports that will be provided for the child in accordance with the IEP.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

For a child with an IEP who transfers into the District from another school system in Arizona, the District, in consultation with the parents, will provide a free appropriate public education (including services comparable to the services described in the existing IEP) until the District:
●  Reviews and adopts the child's IEP from the previous district, or
●  Develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

For a child with an IEP who transfers into the District from another state, the District, in consultation with the parents, will provide a free appropriate public education (including services comparable to the services described in the existing IEP) until the District:
●  Conducts an evaluation for eligibility for special education in Arizona, or determines that such an evaluation is unnecessary; and
●  Develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP, if appropriate.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

To facilitate the transition of a child enrolling from another school system, either from within or from outside of Arizona, the District will take reasonable steps to promptly obtain the child's education records, including all records pertaining to special education, from the previous school system in which the child was enrolled.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

When a records request is received from another district, from either within or outside of Arizona, the District will promptly respond to the request.  [34 C.F.R. 300.323]

In developing each child's IEP, the IEP team will consider:
● The strengths of the child and the concerns of the parents for enhancing the education of their child;
●  The results of the initial or most recent evaluation of the child; and
●  The academic, developmental, and functional needs of the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

In consideration of special factors, the IEP team will:
●  In the case of a child whose behavior impedes his or her learning or that of others, consider the use of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and other strategies to address that behavior;
●  In the case of a child with limited English proficiency, consider the language needs of the child as those needs relate to the child's IEP;
●  In the case of a child who is blind or visually impaired, provide for instruction in Braille and the use of Braille unless the IEP team determines, after an evaluation of the child's reading and writing skills, needs, and appropriate reading and writing media (including an evaluation of the child's future needs for instruction in Braille or the use of Braille) that instruction in Braille or the use of Braille is not appropriate for the child;
●  Consider the communication needs of the child, and in the case of a child who is deaf or hard of hearing, consider the child's language and communication needs, opportunities for direct communication with peers and professional personnel in the child's language and communication mode, academic level and full range of needs, including opportunities for direct instruction in the child's language and communication mode;

1. Shall comply with Arizona Administrative Code R7-2-622 with regard to educational interpreters.
2. If an IEP team determines that a student whose primary language is ASL requires an ASL interpreter and/or aide, the assigned interpreter and/or aide will be an educational interpreter in accordance with A.A.C. R7-2-622.
3. The District may utilize a staff person who is proficient in ASL, as determined by the process in Section iv below, rather than an educational interpreter, in the following circumstances:
   1. When an IEP team determines a student does not need an educational interpreter but would benefit from someone who can communicate in ASL; or
   2. When a student's educational interpreter is on leave and someone needs to fill in; or
   3. When the District is seeking to hire an educational interpreter and needs someone to fill in pending that hire.
4. A staff person's proficiency in ASL will be determined in at least one of the following ways:
   1. Proficiency measured by the District
      1. If the District will be evaluating a staff person's ASL proficiency, the evaluation must be conducted by a District employee who is either:
         1. A qualified ASL interpreter in accordance with A.A.C. R9-26-501; or
         2. A certified educational interpreter in accordance with A.A.C. R7-2-622).
   2. ​​​​​​​Proficiency measured by a third-party evaluator
      1. The District may contract with a third-party evaluator to· determine a staff member's ASL proficiency. The third-party evaluator must be either:
         1. A qualified ASL interpreter in accordance with A.A.C. R9-26-501; or
         2. A certified educational interpreter m accordance with A.A.C. R7-2-622).
   3. ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Whether a staff person's ASL proficiency is measured by the District directly or by a third-party evaluator, the evaluator must endorse the evaluated staff person's ASL proficiency in writing and a copy of that endorsement must be provided to the student/parent and IEP team, so that if there is a question about the staff member's ASL proficiency, it can be addressed by the person who evaluated and endorsed them.

●  Consider whether the child requires assistive technology devices and services.  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

The regular education teacher of a child with a disability, as a member of the IEP team, will, to the extent appropriate, participate in the development, review, and revision of the child's IEP, including the determination of:
●  Appropriate positive behavioral interventions and strategies for the child; and
●  Supplementary aids and services, program modifications, and/or supports for school personnel that will be provided for the child, consistent with §300.320(a)(4).  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

In making changes to the IEP after the annual IEP meeting, the parent and the District may agree to amend the IEP without a meeting for the purpose of making those changes and, instead, develop a written document to amend or modify the child's current IEP.  The District will:
●  Inform all members of the child's IEP team of those changes, and
●  Upon request, provide the parents with the revised copy of the IEP.  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

To the extent possible, the District will encourage the consolidation of evaluation, reevaluation and IEP meetings for a child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

The District ensures that the IEP team reviews the child's IEP periodically, but not less than annually, to determine if goals are being achieved, and revise the IEP, when appropriate, to address:
●  any lack of expected progress toward the annual goals and in the general education curriculum, if appropriate;
●  the results of any reevaluation;
●  information about the child provided to, or by the parents;
●  the child's anticipated needs, or other matters.  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

If a participating agency other than the District fails to provide the transition services in an IEP, the District will reconvene the IEP team to identify alternative strategies to meet the child's transition outcomes.  [34 C.F.R. 300.324]

Before the District places a child with a disability in a private school or facility, the District will initiate and conduct a meeting to develop an IEP for the child and ensure that a representative of the private school or facility attends the meeting in person or by conference call.  [34 C.F.R. 300.325]

Subsequent IEP reviews may be initiated and conducted by the private school at the discretion of the District.  However, the District ensures that:
●  The parents and District representative are involved in any decisions about the child's IEP; and
●  Agree to any proposed changes in the IEP before those changes are implemented.  [34 C.F.R. 300.325]

The District remains responsible to ensure FAPE to a child placed by the District in a private school or facility.  [34 C.F.R. 300.325]

The District ensures that the parents of a child with a disability are members of any group that makes decisions on the educational placement of their child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.327]

Least  Restrictive  Environment
The District ensures that special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only if the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.  [34 C.F.R 300.114]

The District will make available a continuum of alternative placements to meet the needs of children with disabilities for special education and related services.  [34 C.F.R 300.115]

The continuum of alternative placements will include:
●  Instruction in regular classes, special classes, special schools, home instruction, and instruction in hospital and institutions;
●  Supplementary services, such as a resource room or itinerant instruction, to be provided in conjunction with regular class placement.

The placement decision for each child will be:
●  Made by a group that includes the parents and other persons knowledgeable about the child, the meaning of the evaluation data, and the placement options;
●  In conformity with the least restrictive environment (LRE) provisions of the IDEA regulations;
●  Determined at least annually;
●  Based on the child's IEP; and,
●  As close as possible to the child's home.  [34 C.F.R 300.115]

Unless the IEP of a child requires some other arrangement, the child will be educated in the school that they would attend if not disabled.  [34 C.F.R 300.115]

In selecting the LRE, consideration will be given to any potential harmful effect on the child or on the quality of services that they need.  [34 C.F.R 300.115]

A child with a disability will not be removed from age-appropriate regular classrooms solely because of needed modifications in the general education curriculum.  [34 C.F.R 300.115]

In providing or arranging for the provision of nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess periods, and other nonacademic activities, the District ensures that each child with a disability participates with nondisabled children in the extracurricular services and activities to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of that child.  [34 C.F.R 300.117]

The District ensures that the supplementary aides and services determined by the IEP team to be appropriate and necessary are provided to allow the child to participate in nonacademic settings.  [34 C.F.R 300.115]

The District will establish, maintain, and implement procedural safeguards that meet the requirements of §300.500 through 300.536 of the IDEA Regulations.

Procedural  Safeguards
The District ensures that the parents of a child with a disability shall be given an opportunity to inspect and review all education records with respect to the identification, evaluation, educational placement, and the provision of FAPE to the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.501]

The District ensures that the parents of a child with a disability shall:
●  be given an opportunity to participate in meetings with respect to the identification, evaluation, educational placement and the provision of FAPE to the child.
●  be provided notice consistent with §300.322 to ensure they have opportunity to participate in meetings.
●  be members of any group that makes decisions on the educational placement of their child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.501]

If neither parent can participate in a meeting in which a decision is to be made relating to the educational placement of their child, the District must use other methods to ensure their participation, including individual or conference telephone calls, or video conferencing.  [34 C.F.R. 300.501]

A placement decision may be made by a group without the involvement of the parent, if the District is unable to obtain the parent's participation and has maintained a record of its attempts to ensure their involvement.  [34 C.F.R. 300.501]

The parents of a child with a disability have the right to obtain an independent educational evaluation of their child.  The District must provide to parents, upon request for an independent educational evaluation:
●  Information about where an independent educational evaluation may be obtained; and
●  The District criteria applicable for independent educational evaluations.  District criteria for the independent educational evaluation must be the same as the criteria the District uses when it conducts an evaluation, to the extent consistent with the parent's right to an evaluation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.502]

A parent has the right to an independent educational evaluation at public expense if the parent disagrees with an evaluation obtained by the District.  If a parent requests an independent educational evaluation at public expense, the District must, without unnecessary delay, either:
●  File for a due process hearing to show that its evaluation is appropriate; or
●  Ensure that an independent educational evaluation is provided at public expense, unless the District demonstrates in a hearing that the evaluation obtained by the parent did not meet District criteria.  [34 C.F.R. 300.502]

If a due process hearing decision is that the District's evaluation is appropriate, the parent still has the right to an independent educational evaluation, but not at public expense.  [34 C.F.R. 300.502]

If a parent requests an independent educational evaluation, the District may ask for the parent's reasons for the objections, but may not require the parent to provide an explanation and may not unreasonably delay either providing the independent educational evaluation at public expense or filing a request for due process to defend its evaluation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.502]

A parent is entitled to only one (1) independent educational evaluation at public expense each time the District conducts an evaluation with which the parent disagrees.  [34 C.F.R. 300.502]

The results of any independent educational evaluation which is obtained by or provided to the District:
●  must be considered by the District, if it meets District criteria, in any decision with respect to the provision of FAPE to the child; and
●  may be presented by any party as evidence in a due process hearing.  [34 C.F.R. 300.502]

If a hearing officer requests an independent educational evaluation as part of a due process hearing, the cost of the evaluation must be at public expense.

Written notice must be given to the parents of a child with a disability a reasonable time before the District:
●  Proposes to initiate or change the identification, evaluation or educational placement of the child or the provision of FAPE to the child; or
●  Refuses to initiate or change the identification, evaluation or educational placement of the child or the provision of FAPE to the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.503]

The notice must include:
●  A description of the action proposed or refused by the District;
●  An explanation of why the District proposes or refuses to take the action;
●  A description of each evaluation procedure, assessment, record or report the District used as a basis for the proposed or refused action;
●  A statement that the parents of a child with a disability have protection under the procedural safeguards of this part and, if this notice is not an initial referral for evaluation, the means by which a copy of a description of the procedural safeguards can be obtained;
●  Sources for parents to contact to obtain assistance in understanding the provisions of this part;
●  A description of other options that the IEP team considered and the reasons why those options were rejected;
●  A description of other factors that are relevant to the District's proposal or refusal.  [34 C.F.R. 300.503]

The notice must be written in language understandable to the general public, provided in the native language or other mode of communication used by the parent.  [34 C.F.R. 300.503]

If the native language or other mode of communication used by the parent is not a written language, the District ensures:
●  the notice is translated orally or by other means to the parent in his or her native language or other mode of communication;
●  That the parent understands the content of the notice;
●  That there is written evidence of these requirements.  [34 C.F.R. 300.503]

A copy of the procedural safeguards available to the parent of a child with a disability must be given to the parents only one (1) time a school year, except that a copy also must be given to the parents:
●  Upon initial referral or parent request for evaluation;
●  Upon receipt of a first complaint to the state or first request for a due process hearing in a school year;
●  When a disciplinary change of placement /removal has been initiated;
●  Upon request by a parent.  [34 C.F.R. 300.504]

The procedural safeguards notice must include a full explanation of all the procedural safeguards available under §300.148, §§300.151 through 300.153, §300.300, §§300.502 through 300.503, §§300.505 through 300.515, §300.520, §§300.530 through 536, and §§300.610 through 300.625 relating to:
●  Independent educational evaluations;
●  Prior written notice;
●  Parental consent;
●  Access to education records;
●  Opportunity to present and resolve complaints through the due process hearing and state complaint procedures, including; ●  The availability of mediation;
●  The child's placement during the due process hearing;
●  Procedures for students subject to placement in an interim alternative educational setting;
●  Requirements for unilateral placements by parents of children in private schools at public expense;
●  Due process hearings including requirements for disclosure of evaluation results and recommendations;
●  Civil actions, including timelines;
●  Attorney fees.  [34 C.F.R. 300.504]

This notice must meet the same requirements for understandable language as for the written prior notice described in §300.503.  [34 C.F.R. 300.504]
The parent of a child with a disability may elect to receive required notices by an electronic mail communication if the District makes that option available.  [34 C.F.R. 300.505]

The District will establish procedures to allow parties to disputes, including those matters arising prior to a request for a due process hearing, to resolve disputes through mediation.  Procedures will ensure that the mediation process:
●  Is voluntary on the part of the parties;
●  Is not used to deny or delay a parent's right to a due process hearing or any other right under the IDEA;
●  Is conducted by a qualified and impartial mediator who is trained in effective mediation techniques.  [34 C.F.R. 300.506]

The District may establish procedures to offer to parents and schools that choose not to use mediation an opportunity to meet, at a time and location convenient to the parties, with a disinterested party:
●  Who is under contract with an appropriate alternative dispute resolution entity, or a parent training and information center, or community parent resource center;
●  Who would explain the benefits of, and encourage the mediation process to the parents.  [34 C.F.R. 300.506]
A parent or District may file a request for a due process hearing relating to the identification, evaluation or educational placement of a child with a disability.  [34 C.F.R. 300.507]

The request for a due process hearing must allege a violation that occurred not more than two (2) years before the date the parent or District knew or should have known about the alleged violation.  [34 C.F.R. 300.507]

The District must inform the parent of any free or low cost legal and other relevant services available in the area upon parent request.  [34 C.F.R. 300.507]

The District will have procedures that require either party, or the attorney representing a party, to provide to the other party a confidential due process complaint.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

The party filing the notice for a hearing must forward a copy of the request to the state.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

The due process hearing complaint must include the following in order for the complaint to be heard:
●  The name of the child;
●  The residential address of the child;
●  The school of attendance;
●  A description of the nature of the problem of the child relating to the proposed or refused initiation or change, including facts relating to the problem; and
●  A proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and available to the party at the time.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

The due process complaint will be deemed sufficient unless the party receiving the complaint notifies the hearing officer and the other party in writing, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the complaint, that it believes the complaint does not meet the content requirements.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

Within five (5) days of receipt of notice, the hearing officer must determine whether the complaint meets the requirements and notify the parties, in writing, of that determination.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

A party may amend its due process complaint only if:
●  The other party consents in writing and is given an opportunity to resolve the complaint through the resolution process; or
●  The hearing officer grants permission, but in no case later than five (5) days before the due process hearing begins.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

If a party files an amended complaint, the relevant timelines begin again.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

If the District has not sent a prior written notice to the parent regarding the subject matter contained in the due process complaint, it must do so within ten (10) days of receiving the complaint.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

Within ten (10) days of receiving the complaint, the receiving party will send to the other party a response that specifically addresses the issues raised in the due process complaint.  [34 C.F.R. 300.508]

Within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the parent's due process complaint, and prior to the initiation of a due process hearing, the District must convene a meeting with the parent and the relevant members of the IEP team who have specific knowledge of the facts identified in the complaint that:
●  Includes a representative of the District who has District decision-making authority;
●  May not include an attorney of the District unless the parent is accompanied by an attorney.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

The purpose of the meeting is for the parent of the child to discuss the due process complaint, and the factual basis of the complaint, so the District has the opportunity to resolve the dispute.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

The resolution meeting need not be held if:
●  The parent and District agree in writing to waive the meeting; or
●  The parent and District agree to use the mediation process.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

The parent and the District determine the relevant IEP team members to attend the meeting.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

If the District has not resolved the complaint to the satisfaction of the parent within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the complaint, the due process hearing may occur.  The timeline for issuing a final decision begins at the end of this thirty (30) day period.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

The failure of the parent to participate in the resolution meeting that has not been mutually agreed to be waived, will delay the timelines for the resolution process and due process hearing until the meeting is held.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

If the District is unable to obtain the participation of the parent after reasonable efforts have been made and documented, the District may, at the conclusion of the thirty (30) day period, request the hearing officer dismiss the parent's due process complaint.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

If the District fails to hold the resolution meeting within fifteen (15) days of receiving the complaint or fails to participate in the meeting, the parent may request that the hearing officer begin the hearing timeline.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

The forty-five (45) day timeline for the due process hearing starts the day after:
●  Both parties agree in writing to waive the resolution meeting; or
●  After either the mediation or resolution meeting starts but before the end of the thirty (30) day resolution period, the parties agree in writing that no agreement is possible; or
●  If both parties agree in writing to continue the mediation at the end of the thirty (30) day resolution period, but later, one (1) party withdraws from the mediation process.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

If a resolution is reached at the meeting, the parties must execute a legally binding agreement that is:
●  Signed by both the parent and District representative who has authority to legally bind the District; and
●  Enforceable in any state court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

Either party may void the agreement within three (3) business days of the agreement's execution.  [34 C.F.R. 300.510]

The child involved in the due process hearing complaint must remain in his or her current educational placement:
●  Unless a discipline appeal has been filed as provided in §300.533;
●  During the pendency of any administrative or judicial proceeding regarding a due process complaint notice requesting a due process hearing under §300.507; or
●  Unless the District and parents of the child agree otherwise.  [34 C.F.R. 300.518]

If the complaint involves an application for initial admission to public school, the child, with the consent if the parents, must be placed in the public school until the completion of all the proceedings.  [34 C.F.R. 300.518]

If the complaint involves an application for initial services for a child who has turned three (3) and transitioning from Part C to Part B, the District is not required to provide the Part C services the child had been receiving.  If the child is found eligible for special education and related services under Part B, and the parent consents to the initial provision of services under §300.300(b), then the District must provide those services that are not in dispute.  [34 C.F.R. 300.518]

If the hearing officer agrees with the child's parents that a change of placement is appropriate, that placement must be treated as an agreement between the state and parent for the purposes of (1)(c) of this section.  [34 C.F.R. 300.518]

The District ensures that the rights of a child are protected by assigning an individual to act as a surrogate for the parents when:
●  No parent can be identified;
●  After reasonable efforts are made, no parent can be located;
●  The child is a ward of the state (with no foster parent);
●  The child is an unaccompanied homeless youth as defined by the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act.  [34 C.F.R. 300.519]
The District will have a method for determining when a surrogate parent is needed and for making surrogate parent assignments.  [34 C.F.R. 300.519]
The District ensures that a person selected as a surrogate parent:
●  Is not an employee of the state, the District, or any other agency that is involved in the education or care of the child;
●  Has no personal or professional interest that conflicts with the interest of the child the surrogate parent represents; and
●  Has knowledge and skills that ensure adequate representation of the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.519]

​​​​​​​In the case of an unaccompanied homeless youth, appropriate staff of emergency shelters, transitional shelters, independent living programs, and street outreach programs may be appointed as temporary surrogate parents until a surrogate parent can be appointed that meets all the requirements of this section.  [34 C.F.R. 300.519]

When a child with a disability reaches age eighteen (18), unless that child has been determined to be incompetent:
●  The District will provide any notice required by the IDEA regulations to both the child and the parents; and
●  All rights accorded to parents under Part B of the Act transfer to the child.  [34 C.F.R. 300.520]
When the rights are transferred, the District will provide notice to the child and parent of the transfer of rights.  [34 C.F.R. 300.520]

Adopted:        May 13, 2008
Revised:        September 19, 2012 (format change only)
Revised:        September 30, 2016 (Friday Report)
Revised:        December 21, 2018 (Superintendent review)
Revised:        October 23, 2023